I handle them the same way I do other people and creatures. I'm like a mirror. If they don't attack me, I don't attack them. If they don't give me a reason to be hostile, I won't. Not every vampire is automatically evil, nor is every mortal automatically good. There has been good vampires in TES series + a vampire character doesn't even have to kill anyone. Yes, they feed on blood but the bite doesn't kill the victim, nor does it really seem to even harm them. Not every vampire has as macabre menu as Harkon's gang in Dawnguard
philfredobob wrote:[..]what i loved about vampires in TES is how much of a grey moral area it is , for example , if your Typical ''good guy'' gets vampirism , he has to choose between two ways to live : he can either choose not to feed on people, but in doing so become more and more powerful, hungry, Desperate, and dangerous to the very people he is trying to protect from himself
or he can choose to feed on some folks to keep himself in mortal Guise and continue to live among them peacefully , but still end up drinking their blood and ultimatley harming them
I like the way you put this. So many people in mod communities always complain about the vampirism in TES and how it's "backwards" and you should feed more to become more powerful. I personally always liked their different take on it. I see it working in the way that the mortal blood brings them closer to their humanity while refusing it brings them closer to an undead, closer to being a "monster". However, to get that mortal blood back in their bodies they have to perform a rather inhumane act. It's interesting way to portray vampirism.