If Cell 3 holds worthless brass, Cell 2 holds the gold key.
If Cell 1 holds the gold key, Cell 3 holds worthless brass.
If Cell 2 holds worthless brass, Cell 1 holds the gold key.
Knowing this brave fool, and knowing that all that is said cannot be true, which cell contains the gold key?
Fang Lair Riddle- question. SPOILER ALERT
- Satribe
- Apprentice

- Posts: 198
- Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2020 3:36 am
- ES Games: Arena,Daggerfall,Oblivion,Skyrim,ESO
- Platform: PS3,PS4,PC,MAC,Switch
- UESPoints: 0
Fang Lair Riddle- question. SPOILER ALERT
Why is the answer what it is? I made my selection and I was wrong. Why is the correct answer, the right answer?
"Such theorizing is best left to the Scrollkeepers of the Imperial City or the Psijics of the Isle of Artaeum. Tamriel is what it is." - Daggerfall User's Guide
- SeaGtGruff
- Champion

- Posts: 894
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2017 6:25 pm
- ES Games: Arena, Daggerfall, Battlespire, Redguard, Morrowind, Oblivion, Skyrim, ESO, Legends, Blades
- Platform: PC, Mac, iPad
- Status: Breathing, presumed conscious
- Other Profiles: SeaGtGruff (Steam), TinklyGosling47 (Xbox)
- UESPoints: 20
- Location: South Carolina
Re: Fang Lair Riddle- question. SPOILER ALERT
I think it's basically a matter of eliminating the impossible answers to get the right answer.
What if Cell 1 holds the gold key?
Then, by statement 2, Cell 3 must hold worthless brass.
Furthermore, Cell 2 would also hold worthless brass, so statement 3 is okay.
On the other hand, statement 1 could not be true, since it would follow that Cell 2 must hold the gold key, which conflicts with the supposition that Cell 1 holds the gold key.
What if Cell 2 holds the gold key?
Then Cell 3 would hold worthless brass, so statement 1 is okay.
Furthermore, Cell 1 would also hold worthless brass, so statement 2 could be ignored, since Cell 1 would not hold the gold key.
And statement 3 could also be ignored, since Cell 2 would not hold worthless brass.
What if Cell 3 holds the gold key?
Then Cell 3 would not hold worthless brass, so statement 1 could be ignored.
Furthermore, Cell 1 would not hold the gold key, so statement 2 could be ignored.
On the other hand, statement 3 could not be true, since it would follow that Cell 1 must hold the gold key, which conflicts with the supposition that Cell 3 holds the gold key.
Thus, the only choice which doesn't create a conflict is that Cell 2 holds the gold key.
What if Cell 1 holds the gold key?
Then, by statement 2, Cell 3 must hold worthless brass.
Furthermore, Cell 2 would also hold worthless brass, so statement 3 is okay.
On the other hand, statement 1 could not be true, since it would follow that Cell 2 must hold the gold key, which conflicts with the supposition that Cell 1 holds the gold key.
What if Cell 2 holds the gold key?
Then Cell 3 would hold worthless brass, so statement 1 is okay.
Furthermore, Cell 1 would also hold worthless brass, so statement 2 could be ignored, since Cell 1 would not hold the gold key.
And statement 3 could also be ignored, since Cell 2 would not hold worthless brass.
What if Cell 3 holds the gold key?
Then Cell 3 would not hold worthless brass, so statement 1 could be ignored.
Furthermore, Cell 1 would not hold the gold key, so statement 2 could be ignored.
On the other hand, statement 3 could not be true, since it would follow that Cell 1 must hold the gold key, which conflicts with the supposition that Cell 3 holds the gold key.
Thus, the only choice which doesn't create a conflict is that Cell 2 holds the gold key.
ESO mains: Michel Shaldon (PC NA), Miguel Outrider (PC EU)
- Satribe
- Apprentice

- Posts: 198
- Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2020 3:36 am
- ES Games: Arena,Daggerfall,Oblivion,Skyrim,ESO
- Platform: PS3,PS4,PC,MAC,Switch
- UESPoints: 0
Re: Fang Lair Riddle- question. SPOILER ALERT
Cool!
Okay that makes sense to me. I got hung up on the later sentence that states; "...and knowing that all that is said cannot be true...". I was starting with an assumption that at least one of them must be "FALSE".
(Pause)
I also must have made some other assumptions, because now that you've explained it, every time I try to write out what I was originally thinking, I keep finding faulty logic. I thought I had figured that one option would make only one statement FALSE, but now it doesn't seem to work out that way.
Thanks.
Okay that makes sense to me. I got hung up on the later sentence that states; "...and knowing that all that is said cannot be true...". I was starting with an assumption that at least one of them must be "FALSE".
(Pause)
I also must have made some other assumptions, because now that you've explained it, every time I try to write out what I was originally thinking, I keep finding faulty logic. I thought I had figured that one option would make only one statement FALSE, but now it doesn't seem to work out that way.
Thanks.
"Such theorizing is best left to the Scrollkeepers of the Imperial City or the Psijics of the Isle of Artaeum. Tamriel is what it is." - Daggerfall User's Guide