Hahaha don't worry, everyone thinks about this stuff all the time ;>
I'll have to go with Gideon's headcanon, because it matches up with mine and makes the most sense imho :V I mean, mages tend to be the scholarly type, and Urag did mention something along the lines of "a mage is only as good as what he knows," which gets me to thinking that a lot of mental energy is put into being a better mage :V I mean, you have learn new spells by reading new spell tomes, regardless of your skill level.
If you talk with Tolfdir about wards, he mentions that, because wards need to be charged up and take a chunk out of your magicka reserves, they require a keen sense of concentration. Master level spells also take up some time to charge-- which leads me to thinking it's more of mental exhaustion more than anything.
Theificka wrote:DikaSmausha wrote:I dont know about mental strength. That would be like saying if you didn't use magicka, you are dumb.
And this would be the opposite of a thief, who's form is cleverness and trickery, so it doesn't make sense why an assassin would not be smart when he needs to think about every possible action.
But then again, he said how much one
focuses their mental ability, kind of like spiritual meditation, or reasoning?
I think it's a different form of "smarts". A thief character would obviously think about things a mage wouldn't ;> A thief would know what good vantage points are available to him, who goes where at what time, and being able to think lightly on their feet when things go sideways. A mage on the other hand, would require concentration and remembering things they have learned over the years.
A thief is smart, because they know how to think fast and slink their way out of trouble. A mage is smart, because they can concentrate on more difficult tasks or have impeccable memory/logical-thinking skills :> You can't ask either to do the other's job ;> A thief would have a terrible time trying to stay focused on learning a new spell, I think XD