Page 1 of 2
Skyrim 'beaten' in 2 hours
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 6:31 am
by ArgonianDunmer
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/vi ... -Two-Hours'
2:16:10 was the time it took Bethesda's QA tester, Sam Bernstein, to beat the game. Which raises the question, are you going for ''completing'' the game, or for enjoying it as much as possible on your first playthrough?
Re: Skyrim 'beaten in 2 hours
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 6:39 am
by 777
I play games to enjoy them, not beat them. Completing the game is last on my to do list tbh
Re: Skyrim 'beaten in 2 hours
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 6:49 am
by ArgonianDunmer
You say that as if you can't enjoy a game after 'beating' it. There are pluses to both styles of play, imo.
Re: Skyrim 'beaten in 2 hours
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 6:50 am
by Bonfy
Definitely enjoy it. No fun in rushing towards the end.
Oh btw, just to avoid stupid worries, Oblivion was beaten in 75 minutes by these guys, so the two hours are not reflective of the actual time it will take to normal gamers.
Re: Skyrim 'beaten in 2 hours
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 6:54 am
by Spiney
I'll be dicking around in an RP fashion for ages in the game.
Probably running away from dragons in a hilarious manner.
Re: Skyrim 'beaten in 2 hours
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 6:58 am
by ArgonianDunmer
Bonfy wrote:Definitely enjoy it. No fun in rushing towards the end.
Oh btw, just to avoid stupid worries, Oblivion was beaten in 75 minutes by these guys, so the two hours are not reflective of the actual time it will take to normal gamers.
True that, this was a serious speedrun competition. For me, I'll probably focus on questing my first playthrough, and later I'll go out and explore on new playthroughs. Honestly I want to see the main quest and main faction quests more than I want to see the scenery.
Re: Skyrim 'beaten' in 2 hours
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 7:21 am
by 1337onidas
You do not "beat" an Elder Scrolls game. You can complete the main quest, but as far as I'm concerned, since you can keep going no matter how many quests you do, there is no defined goal.
Re: Skyrim 'beaten' in 2 hours
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 7:25 am
by ArgonianDunmer
Obviously, but in this context, the mainquest is what we're talking about. The poll makes things much more clear for you.
Re: Skyrim 'beaten' in 2 hours
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 7:55 am
by Knight
Morrowind was beaten in a little over 7 minutes. It took me a LONG time to finish the main quest. Like the article said, this guy didn't do anything but ran through the quests like there's no tomorrow. Also..
...as well as a pie of his choice, baked by director Todd Howard.
I must finish Skyrim in under 2 hours now.
Re: Skyrim 'beaten in 2 hours
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 9:10 am
by lostlast
Bonfy wrote:Definitely enjoy it. No fun in rushing towards the end.
Oh btw, just to avoid stupid worries, Oblivion was beaten in 75 minutes by these guys, so the two hours are not reflective of the actual time it will take to normal gamers.
Stupid worry aborted. *Massive sigh of relief. Thank F for that.....
Re: Skyrim 'beaten' in 2 hours
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 9:24 am
by Rhcpftw
I wonder what kind of pie Todd baked. I bet it was an apple pie.
So, 75 minutes for Fallout and two hours and 16 minutes for Skyrim? That bodes well, right? How long did it take them to beat Oblivion?
Re: Skyrim 'beaten' in 2 hours
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 9:32 am
by Knight
Oblivion was beaten in 75 minutes by these guys

Re: Skyrim 'beaten' in 2 hours
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 9:42 am
by Rhcpftw
Alright, well no need to worry then...At least not about the length, hehe. Who knows, maybe the main quest will be the biggest disappointment in the history of gaming.
Not that I believe that, Bethesda are awesome. Annoying name for a company though, can't say "bethesda" quickly without sounding like a tool.
Re: Skyrim 'beaten' in 2 hours
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 4:49 pm
by Karl Voss
Did they do that with a new character from scratch? This is just a guess, but if they wanted to test for software glitches playing the main quest, wouldn't it make sense to use a powerful character from the start so time isn't wasted on dying or improving the characters abilities?
Re: Skyrim 'beaten' in 2 hours
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 4:56 pm
by Eltee
That's not the point, the main quest has already been extensively play-tested, this is more of a Bethesda internal event.
Re: Skyrim 'beaten' in 2 hours
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 5:11 pm
by Karl Voss
Yes but do they start with a character from scratch?
Re: Skyrim 'beaten' in 2 hours
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 5:12 pm
by Eltee
Of course.
Re: Skyrim 'beaten' in 2 hours
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 5:38 pm
by Dark Spark
ArgonianDunmer wrote:http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/113646-Skyrim-Beaten-In-Just-Over-Two-Hours'
2:16:10 was the time it took Bethesda's QA tester, Sam Bernstein, to beat the game. Which raises the question, are you going for ''completing'' the game, or for enjoying it as much as possible on your first playthrough?
As a QA tester, Sam's played the game through a hundred times already.
There's a reason why my most cynical and imperturbable characters are named 'Cassandra'— omnipotence may very well be nothing more than the indirect consequence of omniscience.
Re: Skyrim 'beaten' in 2 hours
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 5:51 pm
by Karl Voss
I'd be curious to know what all the parameters are. What difficulty level did they use? It's doubtful they got that time in Oblivion at max difficulty. And if these testers are so darn good, why aren't they playing at max difficulty? They probably use fast travel, which is time-cheating in a sense since it saves time that normally passes in the game. In Oblivion it takes a while just to get out of the sewers at the beginning, and did that record commence before or after the sewer?
Re: Skyrim 'beaten' in 2 hours
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 8:21 pm
by A-BIack_Man
Did he do this in the PC or a console? So when they say "cheats were not allowed," does that mean console commands, or are cheats in fact in the game?
Re: Skyrim 'beaten' in 2 hours
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 10:52 pm
by Vendetta
For a person who has played through the oblivion main quest for the first time, it would take about 30 minutes the second time... So I think it is a big jump.
Re: Skyrim 'beaten' in 2 hours
Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 1:21 am
by whoman69
I will be going for other things. In Oblvion simply going through and beating the main quest is going to take out quite a bit of gameplay. You lose out on Oblivion gates and everybody has a higher disposition towards you which will make it harder to improve speechcraft. I'm sure Skyrim will have similar things that you will miss out by going for the frosting right away.
Re: Skyrim 'beaten' in 2 hours
Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 3:11 am
by born2beagator
Bethesda has claimed it will take players around 30 hours to beat the game's central quest, not including the time it takes them to father (or mother) a dynasty of lizard children
--------------
LOL!!
Me I don't really think about completing the game when I play ES. I just do whatever I feel like doing

Re: Skyrim 'beaten' in 2 hours
Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 4:00 am
by ThE cHoSeN oNe LDB3
just enjoy it
Re: Skyrim 'beaten' in 2 hours
Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 4:10 am
by OblivionDuruza
What constitutes, 'enjoy it'? I sort of agree with ArgonianDunmer actually, Bethesda puts a lot of work into building narrative and engaging storylines, so I'll probably focus on completing the major questlines in my first playthrough, exploring as I do so, but paying particular attention to quests and characters. I know I'm going to enjoy that style of play.